<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 172 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221976</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs.1,53,551 as a difference in sundry creditors, as the discrepancy was found to be only Rs.27 and required reconciliation between the parties. The Tribunal concluded that the initial addition had no basis, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 172 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221976</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs.1,53,551 as a difference in sundry creditors, as the discrepancy was found to be only Rs.27 and required reconciliation between the parties. The Tribunal concluded that the initial addition had no basis, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>