<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 168 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221972</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the cancellation of registration under the KVAT Act. The court accepted the Government Pleader&#039;s clarification that the registration was actually cancelled by an order dated 28/11/12, not on the date mentioned in the notice to the petitioner. The petitioner was directed to provide a copy of the cancellation order to the petitioner to ensure they are informed of the correct date and basis of the registration cancellation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:16:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 168 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221972</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the cancellation of registration under the KVAT Act. The court accepted the Government Pleader&#039;s clarification that the registration was actually cancelled by an order dated 28/11/12, not on the date mentioned in the notice to the petitioner. The petitioner was directed to provide a copy of the cancellation order to the petitioner to ensure they are informed of the correct date and basis of the registration cancellation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>