<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 166 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221970</link>
    <description>Service tax credit was admissible for Share Transfer Agent services because the services had a nexus with the appellant&#039;s business activities and were used in relation to providing output service. Credit cannot be denied merely because the service is not part of the core or principal business activity. The denial of input credit was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 166 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221970</link>
      <description>Service tax credit was admissible for Share Transfer Agent services because the services had a nexus with the appellant&#039;s business activities and were used in relation to providing output service. Credit cannot be denied merely because the service is not part of the core or principal business activity. The denial of input credit was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>