<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 165 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221969</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, for non-payment of service tax on transport of goods by road was not applicable to the appellants due to their reasonable cause for failure to pay. Despite being found liable for service tax, the appellants had a bona fide belief in their entitlement for exemption under Notification No.32/2004-ST and had paid service tax as credit. The Tribunal differentiated the case from deliberate violations, concluding that the penalty was not justified. As a result, the penalty was dropped, and the appeal was resolved in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 165 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221969</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, for non-payment of service tax on transport of goods by road was not applicable to the appellants due to their reasonable cause for failure to pay. Despite being found liable for service tax, the appellants had a bona fide belief in their entitlement for exemption under Notification No.32/2004-ST and had paid service tax as credit. The Tribunal differentiated the case from deliberate violations, concluding that the penalty was not justified. As a result, the penalty was dropped, and the appeal was resolved in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>