<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 163 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221967</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that there was no mala fide intention on the part of the assessee in misdeclaring the imported goods. Despite the misclassification, there was no evidence of intentional evasion of duty or collusion. As a result, the Court found no justification for confiscation, redemption fine, or penalties, dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:07:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 163 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221967</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that there was no mala fide intention on the part of the assessee in misdeclaring the imported goods. Despite the misclassification, there was no evidence of intentional evasion of duty or collusion. As a result, the Court found no justification for confiscation, redemption fine, or penalties, dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>