https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221962 The Tribunal held that Zinc Dross arising during galvanization is not a manufactured product liable for Central Excise duty. Despite the Revenue's arguments based on specific Tariff entries and amendments, the Tribunal relied on legal precedents and Supreme Court decisions to rule that Zinc Dross is not excisable goods. As a result, the Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, setting aside the previous orders and determining that Zinc Dross is not subject to duty. en-us Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221962 The Tribunal held that Zinc Dross arising during galvanization is not a manufactured product liable for Central Excise duty. Despite the Revenue's arguments based on specific Tariff entries and amendments, the Tribunal relied on legal precedents and Supreme Court decisions to rule that Zinc Dross is not excisable goods. As a result, the Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, setting aside the previous orders and determining that Zinc Dross is not subject to duty. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221962