<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 152 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221956</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed various issues related to the valuation of properties and share values under the Wealth Tax Act. It returned some questions unanswered, while deciding in favor of the assessee on others based on legal precedents. The Court clarified the valuation of properties like residential bungalows and the treatment of specific properties, aligning its decisions with previous judgments. Overall, the judgment provided clarity on valuation methodologies and upheld the assessee&#039;s position on certain issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 21:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 152 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221956</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed various issues related to the valuation of properties and share values under the Wealth Tax Act. It returned some questions unanswered, while deciding in favor of the assessee on others based on legal precedents. The Court clarified the valuation of properties like residential bungalows and the treatment of specific properties, aligning its decisions with previous judgments. Overall, the judgment provided clarity on valuation methodologies and upheld the assessee&#039;s position on certain issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>