<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 148 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221952</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied the appellant&#039;s Stay Petition seeking a complete waiver of the per-deposit amount confirmed as ineligible CENVAT Credit, interest, and penalty. While acknowledging the issue&#039;s coverage by a Division Bench decision, the Tribunal emphasized the pending judgment before the High Court and the complexity of the limitation issue. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit the entire confirmed CENVAT Credit amount within eight weeks. However, it granted a stay on the recovery of interest and penalties until the appeal&#039;s final resolution, highlighting the importance of compliance with deposit requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 23:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 148 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221952</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied the appellant&#039;s Stay Petition seeking a complete waiver of the per-deposit amount confirmed as ineligible CENVAT Credit, interest, and penalty. While acknowledging the issue&#039;s coverage by a Division Bench decision, the Tribunal emphasized the pending judgment before the High Court and the complexity of the limitation issue. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit the entire confirmed CENVAT Credit amount within eight weeks. However, it granted a stay on the recovery of interest and penalties until the appeal&#039;s final resolution, highlighting the importance of compliance with deposit requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>