<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 147 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221951</link>
    <description>Amounts incurred by foreign agents as pure agents for statutory compliance and registration abroad were treated as not prima facie forming part of the taxable service value, so pre-deposit was waived on that ground. Enforcement of foreign law by a sovereign authority was also held not to constitute a taxable service merely because a fee was charged, and pre-deposit was waived on that basis as well. Alleged failure to file separate half-yearly returns under an exemption notification was regarded as procedural rather than substantive, and it did not justify denial of interim relief. The appeal was allowed to proceed without pre-deposit during its pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 147 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221951</link>
      <description>Amounts incurred by foreign agents as pure agents for statutory compliance and registration abroad were treated as not prima facie forming part of the taxable service value, so pre-deposit was waived on that ground. Enforcement of foreign law by a sovereign authority was also held not to constitute a taxable service merely because a fee was charged, and pre-deposit was waived on that basis as well. Alleged failure to file separate half-yearly returns under an exemption notification was regarded as procedural rather than substantive, and it did not justify denial of interim relief. The appeal was allowed to proceed without pre-deposit during its pendency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>