<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 145 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221949</link>
    <description>The court directed the return of the petition to SAIL for filing in the appropriate court having jurisdiction over Paradip or Haldia. The period taken by the Delhi High Court and the time taken by the Calcutta High Court in deciding the issue were to be excluded from the limitation period. The appeals were allowed in part, modifying the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 145 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221949</link>
      <description>The court directed the return of the petition to SAIL for filing in the appropriate court having jurisdiction over Paradip or Haldia. The period taken by the Delhi High Court and the time taken by the Calcutta High Court in deciding the issue were to be excluded from the limitation period. The appeals were allowed in part, modifying the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>