<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 140 - Kerala High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221944</link>
    <description>The High Court of Kerala ruled against the assessee concerning disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, aligning with precedent. Regarding the assessment of excess cash, the court held that it need not be treated as income but could be considered as surplus in the suspense account for future liability, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision except for a specific excess amount identified in the previous year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 21:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 140 - Kerala High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221944</link>
      <description>The High Court of Kerala ruled against the assessee concerning disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, aligning with precedent. Regarding the assessment of excess cash, the court held that it need not be treated as income but could be considered as surplus in the suspense account for future liability, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision except for a specific excess amount identified in the previous year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>