https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221936 The Supreme Court held that the appellant company qualified as a "State" under Article 12 of the Constitution due to deep government control. The termination of the respondents' services under an arbitrary clause was deemed unjustifiable and violative of Article 14. The employment contract was declared void for allowing arbitrary termination, entitling the respondents to various benefits. The appeals were dismissed, and the legal heirs of a deceased respondent were granted benefits. en-us Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221936 The Supreme Court held that the appellant company qualified as a "State" under Article 12 of the Constitution due to deep government control. The termination of the respondents' services under an arbitrary clause was deemed unjustifiable and violative of Article 14. The employment contract was declared void for allowing arbitrary termination, entitling the respondents to various benefits. The appeals were dismissed, and the legal heirs of a deceased respondent were granted benefits. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221936