<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 128 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221932</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s Stay Petition seeking waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty, amounting to Rs. 14,39,051. The dispute centered on whether the cost of diesel used during the trial run of DG sets should be included in the assessable value of the final product. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, noting that the purchase orders did not mention erection, installation, or commissioning as part of the sales contract. Therefore, the cost of diesel was not deemed includible in the assessable value. The Tribunal granted the waiver and stayed the recovery of the balance amounts pending appeal disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 23:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 128 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221932</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s Stay Petition seeking waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty, amounting to Rs. 14,39,051. The dispute centered on whether the cost of diesel used during the trial run of DG sets should be included in the assessable value of the final product. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, noting that the purchase orders did not mention erection, installation, or commissioning as part of the sales contract. Therefore, the cost of diesel was not deemed includible in the assessable value. The Tribunal granted the waiver and stayed the recovery of the balance amounts pending appeal disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>