https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221925 The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's decision that the appellant was a 'paying guest' under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, and not a 'licensee'. The Court dismissed the appeal but granted the appellant six months to vacate the premises. en-us Tue, 03 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221925 The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's decision that the appellant was a 'paying guest' under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, and not a 'licensee'. The Court dismissed the appeal but granted the appellant six months to vacate the premises. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221925