https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221908 The Tribunal allowed refund claims for the period post 27/02/2010 as the export condition was met. However, refund claims for services provided onsite by subsidiaries abroad prior to 27/02/2010 were denied as they did not meet export criteria. The Tribunal directed verification and allowance of CENVAT Credit for input services with procedural discrepancies. The alternative refund claim under Section 11B was rejected. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Dec 2014 11:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221908 The Tribunal allowed refund claims for the period post 27/02/2010 as the export condition was met. However, refund claims for services provided onsite by subsidiaries abroad prior to 27/02/2010 were denied as they did not meet export criteria. The Tribunal directed verification and allowance of CENVAT Credit for input services with procedural discrepancies. The alternative refund claim under Section 11B was rejected. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221908