https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221901 Coercive recovery should not be pursued while a stay application remains pending for reasons beyond the assessee's control, where a binding circular as interpreted by the Court restrains such action. The authorities were found unjustified in leaving the stay application undisposed of and proceeding with recovery. However, because the amount had already been withdrawn, no direction was made for restitution. The matter instead called for expeditious disposal of the appeal and circulation of the earlier judgment to ensure compliance with the binding limitation on recovery. en-us Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jun 2015 10:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221901 Coercive recovery should not be pursued while a stay application remains pending for reasons beyond the assessee's control, where a binding circular as interpreted by the Court restrains such action. The authorities were found unjustified in leaving the stay application undisposed of and proceeding with recovery. However, because the amount had already been withdrawn, no direction was made for restitution. The matter instead called for expeditious disposal of the appeal and circulation of the earlier judgment to ensure compliance with the binding limitation on recovery. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221901