https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221901 The court held that coercive recovery actions should not have been taken while a stay application was pending without valid reasons. It referred to a previous case stating that recovery proceedings can be initiated if the stay application remains pending unreasonably due to default or improper conduct. The court found no justification for keeping the stay application pending and ordered expeditious disposal of the appeal within four weeks. The petition was disposed of with no costs, emphasizing compliance with court directions to prevent delays and hardship on the assessee. en-us Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jun 2015 10:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221901 The court held that coercive recovery actions should not have been taken while a stay application was pending without valid reasons. It referred to a previous case stating that recovery proceedings can be initiated if the stay application remains pending unreasonably due to default or improper conduct. The court found no justification for keeping the stay application pending and ordered expeditious disposal of the appeal within four weeks. The petition was disposed of with no costs, emphasizing compliance with court directions to prevent delays and hardship on the assessee. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221901