<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 87 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221891</link>
    <description>The court found that the search conducted under Section 105 of the Customs Act was invalid due to discrepancies in the authorization process and lack of a valid reason to believe that it would lead to goods liable for confiscation or relevant documents. Emphasizing the necessity for proper authorization, the court quashed the search, ruling it not in accordance with the law. The decision was absolute with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 22:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 87 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221891</link>
      <description>The court found that the search conducted under Section 105 of the Customs Act was invalid due to discrepancies in the authorization process and lack of a valid reason to believe that it would lead to goods liable for confiscation or relevant documents. Emphasizing the necessity for proper authorization, the court quashed the search, ruling it not in accordance with the law. The decision was absolute with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>