<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 86 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221890</link>
    <description>On re-import of rejected and defective exported goods, ordinary valuation rules for first-time imports could not be mechanically applied to adopt the original export transaction value as the assessable value. The relevant consideration was the nature of the re-imported goods and whether the declared value was shown to be incorrect. As the Revenue produced no evidence that the re-import value was understated or that a higher value was warranted, the assessable value accepted by the appellate authority was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 22:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 86 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221890</link>
      <description>On re-import of rejected and defective exported goods, ordinary valuation rules for first-time imports could not be mechanically applied to adopt the original export transaction value as the assessable value. The relevant consideration was the nature of the re-imported goods and whether the declared value was shown to be incorrect. As the Revenue produced no evidence that the re-import value was understated or that a higher value was warranted, the assessable value accepted by the appellate authority was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>