<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 85 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221889</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed without any order as to costs. The Arbitrator&#039;s findings and award were upheld, affirming the appellant&#039;s liability for the unpaid fees and the respondent&#039;s entitlement to cease work due to non-payment. The court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in arbitration matters, reinforcing the finality of the Arbitrator&#039;s decisions on factual and contractual interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 21:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 85 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221889</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed without any order as to costs. The Arbitrator&#039;s findings and award were upheld, affirming the appellant&#039;s liability for the unpaid fees and the respondent&#039;s entitlement to cease work due to non-payment. The court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in arbitration matters, reinforcing the finality of the Arbitrator&#039;s decisions on factual and contractual interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>