https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221885 The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Cenvat credit, duty demand, and penalty imposed on the appellant for inadmissible credit availed on various items. The extended limitation period under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act was deemed justified due to the appellant's suppression of material facts to evade excise duty liability. The appellant failed to prove the goods were used for manufacturing final products, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirmation of the original decision. en-us Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Apr 2013 22:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221885 The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Cenvat credit, duty demand, and penalty imposed on the appellant for inadmissible credit availed on various items. The extended limitation period under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act was deemed justified due to the appellant's suppression of material facts to evade excise duty liability. The appellant failed to prove the goods were used for manufacturing final products, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirmation of the original decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221885