https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221863 In a customs prosecution under Sections 132 and 135(1)(a) of the Customs Act, the High Court held that its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC is extraordinary and must be used sparingly, only to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice. Because Section 173(4) CrPC applies to police report cases and not complaint cases, the complainant's objection to supplying relied-upon documents did not justify interference. No abuse of process or miscarriage of justice was shown, while refusal of copies would hinder a fair and expeditious trial. The order directing supply of documents was therefore left undisturbed. en-us Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Apr 2022 18:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221863 In a customs prosecution under Sections 132 and 135(1)(a) of the Customs Act, the High Court held that its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC is extraordinary and must be used sparingly, only to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice. Because Section 173(4) CrPC applies to police report cases and not complaint cases, the complainant's objection to supplying relied-upon documents did not justify interference. No abuse of process or miscarriage of justice was shown, while refusal of copies would hinder a fair and expeditious trial. The order directing supply of documents was therefore left undisturbed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221863