<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 52 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221856</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, as there was no intent to evade payment of duty by the assessee. The appeal was allowed based on the finding that the assessee&#039;s actions did not demonstrate any intention to evade duty, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision to overturn the penalty under Rule 25.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 52 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221856</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, as there was no intent to evade payment of duty by the assessee. The appeal was allowed based on the finding that the assessee&#039;s actions did not demonstrate any intention to evade duty, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision to overturn the penalty under Rule 25.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>