<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 37 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221841</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes after the Tribunal remitted the issue back to the CIT (A) for reevaluation considering the relinquishment deed under rule 46A. The decision emphasized procedural fairness and the right to present crucial evidence, focusing on the admissibility of additional evidence rather than other grounds raised in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 37 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221841</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes after the Tribunal remitted the issue back to the CIT (A) for reevaluation considering the relinquishment deed under rule 46A. The decision emphasized procedural fairness and the right to present crucial evidence, focusing on the admissibility of additional evidence rather than other grounds raised in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>