<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 35 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221839</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the CIT(A) for assessment year 2007-08, similar to the decision for the preceding year. The CIT(A) is instructed to provide a detailed order after considering all relevant facts and legal precedents, ensuring a fair hearing for the assessee. The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the necessity of a comprehensive examination of facts and adherence to legal principles in determining the classification of income from share transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 06:25:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 35 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221839</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the CIT(A) for assessment year 2007-08, similar to the decision for the preceding year. The CIT(A) is instructed to provide a detailed order after considering all relevant facts and legal precedents, ensuring a fair hearing for the assessee. The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the necessity of a comprehensive examination of facts and adherence to legal principles in determining the classification of income from share transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>