<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 22 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221826</link>
    <description>The court interpreted tax entries in the M.P. Commercial Tax Act 1994 and classified specific manufactured items. The items were assessed under different tax entries based on their nature and usage. The court differentiated between cosmetic and medicinal items, ultimately directing the Assessing Officer to modify the assessment orders for two items, ensuring proper classification and taxation in accordance with the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 06:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 22 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221826</link>
      <description>The court interpreted tax entries in the M.P. Commercial Tax Act 1994 and classified specific manufactured items. The items were assessed under different tax entries based on their nature and usage. The court differentiated between cosmetic and medicinal items, ultimately directing the Assessing Officer to modify the assessment orders for two items, ensuring proper classification and taxation in accordance with the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>