https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221822 The Tribunal found that the Commissioner had jurisdiction to issue the show cause notice despite the service being rendered in a different location. The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit 25% of the confirmed Service Tax amount within eight weeks, with the balance and penalties waived and recovery stayed during the appeal. The Tribunal also ruled that the reverse charge mechanism may not apply to the services provided by the applicant, leading to a requirement for partial deposit of the dues. Additionally, the Tribunal addressed the limitation on demand issue, directing the applicant to deposit 25% of the confirmed Service Tax amount within eight weeks to avoid dismissal of the appeal. en-us Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Apr 2013 08:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221822 The Tribunal found that the Commissioner had jurisdiction to issue the show cause notice despite the service being rendered in a different location. The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit 25% of the confirmed Service Tax amount within eight weeks, with the balance and penalties waived and recovery stayed during the appeal. The Tribunal also ruled that the reverse charge mechanism may not apply to the services provided by the applicant, leading to a requirement for partial deposit of the dues. Additionally, the Tribunal addressed the limitation on demand issue, directing the applicant to deposit 25% of the confirmed Service Tax amount within eight weeks to avoid dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221822