<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221821</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the High Court&#039;s decision to restore the Land Acquisition Officer&#039;s compensation assessment in the villages of Harthala and Mukkarrabpur. The Court upheld the High Court&#039;s reliance on the precedent set in Gafar&#039;s case, emphasizing the unreliability of evidence supporting enhanced compensation. Despite procedural issues in the High Court, the Supreme Court deemed remanding the matters unnecessary, citing consistency with established precedent. The Court prohibited the recovery of compensation already paid and eased costs due to the prolonged duration since the land acquisition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221821</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the High Court&#039;s decision to restore the Land Acquisition Officer&#039;s compensation assessment in the villages of Harthala and Mukkarrabpur. The Court upheld the High Court&#039;s reliance on the precedent set in Gafar&#039;s case, emphasizing the unreliability of evidence supporting enhanced compensation. Despite procedural issues in the High Court, the Supreme Court deemed remanding the matters unnecessary, citing consistency with established precedent. The Court prohibited the recovery of compensation already paid and eased costs due to the prolonged duration since the land acquisition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>