https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221819 The mere filing of an appeal, or the period still available for filing one, does not create an automatic stay of an enforceable demand. In the absence of a specific stay order, the revenue may proceed with recovery, and the pendency of appellate limitation does not by itself bar execution of the assessed demand. The court therefore upheld recovery and rejected the contention that the assessee was entitled to protection during the appeal period. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Apr 2013 08:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221819 The mere filing of an appeal, or the period still available for filing one, does not create an automatic stay of an enforceable demand. In the absence of a specific stay order, the revenue may proceed with recovery, and the pendency of appellate limitation does not by itself bar execution of the assessed demand. The court therefore upheld recovery and rejected the contention that the assessee was entitled to protection during the appeal period. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221819