https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221819 The court dismissed the petition challenging the communication declining a stay of demand until the appeal filing time limit expiry. The court emphasized that there is no automatic stay of liability after an enforceable order is passed, citing relevant Supreme Court precedents. It concluded that the revenue was not prevented from executing the order despite the petitioner's pending appeal filing time. Therefore, the court found no merit in the petitioner's argument for a stay of recovery proceedings during the appeal limitation period, leading to the dismissal of the petition. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Apr 2013 08:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221819 The court dismissed the petition challenging the communication declining a stay of demand until the appeal filing time limit expiry. The court emphasized that there is no automatic stay of liability after an enforceable order is passed, citing relevant Supreme Court precedents. It concluded that the revenue was not prevented from executing the order despite the petitioner's pending appeal filing time. Therefore, the court found no merit in the petitioner's argument for a stay of recovery proceedings during the appeal limitation period, leading to the dismissal of the petition. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221819