<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 14 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221818</link>
    <description>The High Court held that obtaining clearance from the Committee of Disputes was no longer necessary. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remitted the matter back to the Tribunal to hear the case on merits. The appeal was allowed for the Tribunal to decide the matter on its substance, emphasizing the importance of adjudicating appeals on their merits rather than dismissing them on procedural grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 06:03:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 14 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221818</link>
      <description>The High Court held that obtaining clearance from the Committee of Disputes was no longer necessary. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remitted the matter back to the Tribunal to hear the case on merits. The appeal was allowed for the Tribunal to decide the matter on its substance, emphasizing the importance of adjudicating appeals on their merits rather than dismissing them on procedural grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>