<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 6 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221810</link>
    <description>The court granted a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff, a measuring tape company, in a trademark infringement and passing off suit. The defendants were restrained from using the trademark &quot;FREEDOM&quot; for measuring tapes due to deceptive similarity with the plaintiff&#039;s registered trademark &quot;FREEMANS.&quot; The court found the defendants&#039; actions intentional to benefit from the plaintiff&#039;s goodwill and reputation built over five decades. Although damages were not awarded, the judgment emphasized the importance of protecting trademarks to prevent consumer confusion and maintain brand reputation in the market.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 6 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221810</link>
      <description>The court granted a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff, a measuring tape company, in a trademark infringement and passing off suit. The defendants were restrained from using the trademark &quot;FREEDOM&quot; for measuring tapes due to deceptive similarity with the plaintiff&#039;s registered trademark &quot;FREEMANS.&quot; The court found the defendants&#039; actions intentional to benefit from the plaintiff&#039;s goodwill and reputation built over five decades. Although damages were not awarded, the judgment emphasized the importance of protecting trademarks to prevent consumer confusion and maintain brand reputation in the market.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>