<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 4 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221808</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed CESTAT&#039;s decision due to inadequately addressing key legal issues regarding the transfer of raw materials to job workers and the credit of duty paid. The court emphasized the importance of thorough analysis and directed CESTAT to reconsider the matter, addressing all previous questions formulated. The judgment highlighted the need for meticulous examination of facts and legal provisions for a fair interpretation of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 4 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221808</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed CESTAT&#039;s decision due to inadequately addressing key legal issues regarding the transfer of raw materials to job workers and the credit of duty paid. The court emphasized the importance of thorough analysis and directed CESTAT to reconsider the matter, addressing all previous questions formulated. The judgment highlighted the need for meticulous examination of facts and legal provisions for a fair interpretation of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>