<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 570 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221804</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Tax Case Appeals. It was held that the rectification sought by the assessee regarding the rate of tax under the Wealth Tax Act was not justified as the relevant facts were not presented during the original assessment, making it legally unsustainable under Section 35 of the Act. The Court concurred with the Tribunal that there was no mistake apparent from the record warranting rectification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 570 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221804</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Tax Case Appeals. It was held that the rectification sought by the assessee regarding the rate of tax under the Wealth Tax Act was not justified as the relevant facts were not presented during the original assessment, making it legally unsustainable under Section 35 of the Act. The Court concurred with the Tribunal that there was no mistake apparent from the record warranting rectification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>