<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 568 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221802</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the assessment order, advising the petitioner to appeal within two weeks. The court directed the petitioner to pursue remedies under the OVAT Act, emphasizing the appellate authority&#039;s role in adjudicating factual and legal issues, including the exemption claim under Notification No.629/2008. The importance of following statutory procedures and allowing fact-finding by the appropriate authority was underscored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 568 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221802</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the assessment order, advising the petitioner to appeal within two weeks. The court directed the petitioner to pursue remedies under the OVAT Act, emphasizing the appellate authority&#039;s role in adjudicating factual and legal issues, including the exemption claim under Notification No.629/2008. The importance of following statutory procedures and allowing fact-finding by the appropriate authority was underscored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>