<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 568 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221802</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to reassessment is ordinarily not entertained where the dispute turns on mixed and disputed facts, such as whether transactions are inter-State or intra-State sales, and the taxing statute provides an effective appellate remedy. The factual questions, including delivery, transport endorsements and receipt of goods, must be examined by the appellate fact-finding authority rather than in writ jurisdiction. The document also states that an assessee cannot replace a return-based exemption claim with a wholly different exemption claim in reassessment proceedings without filing a revised return or otherwise following the procedure prescribed by the taxing statute. The proper course is to raise such objections before the appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 568 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221802</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to reassessment is ordinarily not entertained where the dispute turns on mixed and disputed facts, such as whether transactions are inter-State or intra-State sales, and the taxing statute provides an effective appellate remedy. The factual questions, including delivery, transport endorsements and receipt of goods, must be examined by the appellate fact-finding authority rather than in writ jurisdiction. The document also states that an assessee cannot replace a return-based exemption claim with a wholly different exemption claim in reassessment proceedings without filing a revised return or otherwise following the procedure prescribed by the taxing statute. The proper course is to raise such objections before the appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>