<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 560 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221794</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s rejection of the assessee&#039;s plea regarding a statement under Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act was upheld. The addition of Rupees nine lakhs based on the recorded statement was deemed sustainable, as the assessee&#039;s explanation regarding the amount paid to daughters was found inadequate. The failure to retract the statement within a relevant period was considered crucial, leading to the confirmation of the amount&#039;s addition. The Court emphasized the importance of timely and consistent responses in statutory matters, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal without further arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 560 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221794</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s rejection of the assessee&#039;s plea regarding a statement under Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act was upheld. The addition of Rupees nine lakhs based on the recorded statement was deemed sustainable, as the assessee&#039;s explanation regarding the amount paid to daughters was found inadequate. The failure to retract the statement within a relevant period was considered crucial, leading to the confirmation of the amount&#039;s addition. The Court emphasized the importance of timely and consistent responses in statutory matters, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal without further arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>