<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 541 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221775</link>
    <description>The case involved a Clearing &amp;amp; Forwarding Agent disputing the inclusion of reimbursements in Service Tax calculations. The appellant contended that reimbursements should be excluded based on previous tribunal decisions, while the Revenue argued for their inclusion. The court noted conflicting views and referred the matter to a larger bench for a definitive ruling on the treatment of reimbursement charges in Service Tax calculations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 541 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221775</link>
      <description>The case involved a Clearing &amp;amp; Forwarding Agent disputing the inclusion of reimbursements in Service Tax calculations. The appellant contended that reimbursements should be excluded based on previous tribunal decisions, while the Revenue argued for their inclusion. The court noted conflicting views and referred the matter to a larger bench for a definitive ruling on the treatment of reimbursement charges in Service Tax calculations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>