<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 536 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221770</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to reopen the assessment for A.Y. 2005-06, as the assessee failed to fully disclose all material facts necessary for assessment, including a long term capital loss on the sale of shares. The court emphasized the importance of candid and accurate disclosure without any suppression of facts. The petition challenging the notice for reopening the assessment was dismissed, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:31:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 536 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221770</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to reopen the assessment for A.Y. 2005-06, as the assessee failed to fully disclose all material facts necessary for assessment, including a long term capital loss on the sale of shares. The court emphasized the importance of candid and accurate disclosure without any suppression of facts. The petition challenging the notice for reopening the assessment was dismissed, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>