https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221760 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's rectification of mistake (ROM) application concerning a mistake in CESTAT's Order, emphasizing that rectification should be limited to obvious errors, not debatable legal points. The Tribunal ruled that the issue raised regarding Rule 6(3)(a)(vi) of Cenvat Credit Rules could not be entertained in the rectification application, citing the Supreme Court's decision on the scope of rectification. en-us Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221760 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's rectification of mistake (ROM) application concerning a mistake in CESTAT's Order, emphasizing that rectification should be limited to obvious errors, not debatable legal points. The Tribunal ruled that the issue raised regarding Rule 6(3)(a)(vi) of Cenvat Credit Rules could not be entertained in the rectification application, citing the Supreme Court's decision on the scope of rectification. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221760