<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 521 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221755</link>
    <description>Alternative statutory remedy does not bar writ jurisdiction where the challenge is founded on breach of natural justice or lack of jurisdiction, and the writ was therefore maintainable. In sales tax assessment, liability must be proved on legally admissible material showing actual taxable sales; reliance on external reports, bank entries and income-tax material without independent scrutiny, coupled with denial of effective cross-examination of relied-upon witnesses, rendered the assessment orders unsustainable and liable to be quashed. A limitation challenge to the block assessment also failed, because the block assessment provision covered the relevant evasion period and the extending notification was found to be within time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 521 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221755</link>
      <description>Alternative statutory remedy does not bar writ jurisdiction where the challenge is founded on breach of natural justice or lack of jurisdiction, and the writ was therefore maintainable. In sales tax assessment, liability must be proved on legally admissible material showing actual taxable sales; reliance on external reports, bank entries and income-tax material without independent scrutiny, coupled with denial of effective cross-examination of relied-upon witnesses, rendered the assessment orders unsustainable and liable to be quashed. A limitation challenge to the block assessment also failed, because the block assessment provision covered the relevant evasion period and the extending notification was found to be within time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>