https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221733 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming a demand of Rs. 54,34,152/- against a paint manufacturer for alleged clandestine removal of Cenvat credit availed inputs. The decision was based on the lack of concrete evidence supporting the allegations, primarily relying on discrepancies in stock records without substantial proof of removal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantial evidence, ruling in favor of the appellant and allowing the appeals and stay applications for final disposal. en-us Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221733 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming a demand of Rs. 54,34,152/- against a paint manufacturer for alleged clandestine removal of Cenvat credit availed inputs. The decision was based on the lack of concrete evidence supporting the allegations, primarily relying on discrepancies in stock records without substantial proof of removal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantial evidence, ruling in favor of the appellant and allowing the appeals and stay applications for final disposal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221733