<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 489 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221723</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case concerning the determination of arms&#039; length price for assessment years 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2005-06. The Tribunal confirmed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) findings as the revenue failed to provide sufficient reasons to challenge them. Despite the revenue&#039;s argument that the Tribunal should have recorded its own findings, the Court ruled that agreeing entirely with the lower authority, in the absence of new grounds, was not irregular. The decision underscores the necessity of presenting substantive arguments and evidence to contest tax assessment outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 489 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221723</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case concerning the determination of arms&#039; length price for assessment years 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2005-06. The Tribunal confirmed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) findings as the revenue failed to provide sufficient reasons to challenge them. Despite the revenue&#039;s argument that the Tribunal should have recorded its own findings, the Court ruled that agreeing entirely with the lower authority, in the absence of new grounds, was not irregular. The decision underscores the necessity of presenting substantive arguments and evidence to contest tax assessment outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>