https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221710 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that denied CENVAT credit to the appellant based on duty paid by a job worker supplying goods. It was established that the inputs were covered by valid documents for credit, and the duty paid by the job worker was not refunded to the respondent. Citing relevant precedents, the Tribunal held that duty paid on inputs used in manufacturing the final product must be allowed as credit, and questions on dutiability or assessable value cannot be raised at the end of the manufacturer. The appellant's appeals were therefore allowed. en-us Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221710 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that denied CENVAT credit to the appellant based on duty paid by a job worker supplying goods. It was established that the inputs were covered by valid documents for credit, and the duty paid by the job worker was not refunded to the respondent. Citing relevant precedents, the Tribunal held that duty paid on inputs used in manufacturing the final product must be allowed as credit, and questions on dutiability or assessable value cannot be raised at the end of the manufacturer. The appellant's appeals were therefore allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221710