<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 451 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221685</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of rectifying procedural defects before dismissing an appeal outright. The judgment underscores the significance of following due process and providing appellants with an opportunity to rectify any irregularities before a final decision is made on the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 451 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221685</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of rectifying procedural defects before dismissing an appeal outright. The judgment underscores the significance of following due process and providing appellants with an opportunity to rectify any irregularities before a final decision is made on the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>