https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221680 An appeal rejected for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was remanded because the service tax amount had already been deposited and the earlier dismissal was not on merits. The matter was sent back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication without insisting on any further pre-deposit, with liberty to the appellant to produce documentary evidence and with a direction to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing. en-us Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Mar 2013 23:11:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221680 An appeal rejected for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was remanded because the service tax amount had already been deposited and the earlier dismissal was not on merits. The matter was sent back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication without insisting on any further pre-deposit, with liberty to the appellant to produce documentary evidence and with a direction to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221680