<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 442 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221676</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision of the Central Information Commission (CIC) regarding the disclosure of information sought under the Right to Information Act. It ruled that the exemptions under Sections 8(1)(j), 8(1)(e), and 8(1)(g) were not applicable as the information related to public activity and did not endanger life or safety. The court also affirmed the CIC&#039;s decision, allowing the petitioner to consider the application of Section 10 concerning the names of officers involved in the disciplinary proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 22:52:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 442 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221676</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision of the Central Information Commission (CIC) regarding the disclosure of information sought under the Right to Information Act. It ruled that the exemptions under Sections 8(1)(j), 8(1)(e), and 8(1)(g) were not applicable as the information related to public activity and did not endanger life or safety. The court also affirmed the CIC&#039;s decision, allowing the petitioner to consider the application of Section 10 concerning the names of officers involved in the disciplinary proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>