<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 438 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221672</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the appellant, allowing the deduction of bad debts and late payment of employees&#039; provident fund contributions. The interpretation of Section 72A(7)(aa) post-amalgamation was also ruled in favor of the appellant. The judgment emphasized adherence to accounting practices and legal provisions for determining deductions and liabilities in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 438 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221672</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the appellant, allowing the deduction of bad debts and late payment of employees&#039; provident fund contributions. The interpretation of Section 72A(7)(aa) post-amalgamation was also ruled in favor of the appellant. The judgment emphasized adherence to accounting practices and legal provisions for determining deductions and liabilities in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>