<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 437 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221671</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and restored the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order, allowing the appeal by the Revenue. The judgment emphasizes compliance with Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, the burden of proof on the assessee regarding expenditure, and the validity of orders based on factual considerations rather than a mere change of opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 437 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221671</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and restored the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order, allowing the appeal by the Revenue. The judgment emphasizes compliance with Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, the burden of proof on the assessee regarding expenditure, and the validity of orders based on factual considerations rather than a mere change of opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>