<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 433 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221667</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal due to incorrect authorization for filing the appeal and lack of jurisdiction of the Committee of Commissioners to review the order of the first appellate authority. The Tribunal found that the appeal lacked proper authorization as it was directed by authorities outside their jurisdiction, leading to its rejection. It was suggested that the Revenue authorities file a new appeal with the appropriate authorization if necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 23:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 433 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221667</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal due to incorrect authorization for filing the appeal and lack of jurisdiction of the Committee of Commissioners to review the order of the first appellate authority. The Tribunal found that the appeal lacked proper authorization as it was directed by authorities outside their jurisdiction, leading to its rejection. It was suggested that the Revenue authorities file a new appeal with the appropriate authorization if necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>