<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 429 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221663</link>
    <description>The court nullified Trade Notice No. 19/96, ruling it illegal and against Section 4(2) of the Central Excise Act. The court upheld the petitioner&#039;s challenge, emphasizing the exclusion of transportation charges in excise duty valuation, in line with statutory provisions and Supreme Court precedents. The court directed the petitioner to maintain excise duty accounts as per the law, with no duty realization until further orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 22:50:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 429 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221663</link>
      <description>The court nullified Trade Notice No. 19/96, ruling it illegal and against Section 4(2) of the Central Excise Act. The court upheld the petitioner&#039;s challenge, emphasizing the exclusion of transportation charges in excise duty valuation, in line with statutory provisions and Supreme Court precedents. The court directed the petitioner to maintain excise duty accounts as per the law, with no duty realization until further orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>