<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 421 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221655</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of service tax demand, interest, and penalties due to the suppression of income by the Appellant. The Appellant&#039;s claim for a reduction in service tax liability was rejected due to lack of evidence, and penalties under Sections 76 and 77 were set aside as the Appellant had paid the dues early. The Tribunal directed the original adjudicating authority to calculate the actual service tax liability, interest, and penalty, allowing the Appellant a refund of any excess amount deposited after the correct calculations were made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 22:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 421 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221655</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of service tax demand, interest, and penalties due to the suppression of income by the Appellant. The Appellant&#039;s claim for a reduction in service tax liability was rejected due to lack of evidence, and penalties under Sections 76 and 77 were set aside as the Appellant had paid the dues early. The Tribunal directed the original adjudicating authority to calculate the actual service tax liability, interest, and penalty, allowing the Appellant a refund of any excess amount deposited after the correct calculations were made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>