<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 418 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221652</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision to delete the addition based on the lack of evidence supporting the revenue&#039;s claim of extra consideration in the property transaction. The judgment emphasized the importance of the revenue meeting the burden of proof before relying on valuation reports for making additions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 418 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221652</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision to delete the addition based on the lack of evidence supporting the revenue&#039;s claim of extra consideration in the property transaction. The judgment emphasized the importance of the revenue meeting the burden of proof before relying on valuation reports for making additions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>